In November 2013, former Lostprophets frontman Ian Watkins was convicted of a series of horrific crimes against children. 12 years later, Watkins met his end while locked up in a high security prison
Since it would be bizarre for him to get random women to abuse their children and give him them, I conclude he was able to figure out which fans were predators by the fact drug addicts go to concerts and take their children... with violent ones having children with visible injuries. Also, rock n' roll became popular in the sexual revolution, and thus was part of the milieu which included pederasty and paedophile rights. Also, the fact he wasn't a sex slave in prison or even a prison girlfriend but was just exhorted implies he was involved in the Greater Home Counties mob, which is involved in the sex industry. Also, the fact he was a teenager when he entered music and the awful boy bands with their bad music were a result of being preyed on by music executives and Greater Hollywood like Kevin Spacey means he was sexually abused himself because he was Cambro-Norman - of the ilk of Strongbow's followers who conquered Ireland - as opposed to Anglo-Norman. Rape is not about sex but power, so the sex industry is not actually about sex but power, which would have made it easier for Ian Watkins to convince fans to help him.
Rape being not about sex but power is backed up by Big Bubba and soldiers who rape men not being gay, the fact Ian Watkins raped babies but adult babies don't rape babies, and furries are not the people convicted of raping animals. Further evidence is that infantophilia and hebephilia are two different things but Ian Watkins raped babies and pubescents. Fans helping him can be explained by the social deprivation theory of crime - that crime is driven by grievances against society - which fits with Ian Watkins being Cambro-Norman and rock n' roll being about rebellion. The fans and him were Sadeans who wanted power over others in a intersectional society.
There’s a lot about this story that would make me wonder if it’s all made up, faked. The actor who played the performer, “Ian”, could be walking around the streets with no one the wiser.
He got off easy if you ask me. This story made my skin crawl.....which I guess is the point of reading this blog LOL
Since it would be bizarre for him to get random women to abuse their children and give him them, I conclude he was able to figure out which fans were predators by the fact drug addicts go to concerts and take their children... with violent ones having children with visible injuries. Also, rock n' roll became popular in the sexual revolution, and thus was part of the milieu which included pederasty and paedophile rights. Also, the fact he wasn't a sex slave in prison or even a prison girlfriend but was just exhorted implies he was involved in the Greater Home Counties mob, which is involved in the sex industry. Also, the fact he was a teenager when he entered music and the awful boy bands with their bad music were a result of being preyed on by music executives and Greater Hollywood like Kevin Spacey means he was sexually abused himself because he was Cambro-Norman - of the ilk of Strongbow's followers who conquered Ireland - as opposed to Anglo-Norman. Rape is not about sex but power, so the sex industry is not actually about sex but power, which would have made it easier for Ian Watkins to convince fans to help him.
Rape being not about sex but power is backed up by Big Bubba and soldiers who rape men not being gay, the fact Ian Watkins raped babies but adult babies don't rape babies, and furries are not the people convicted of raping animals. Further evidence is that infantophilia and hebephilia are two different things but Ian Watkins raped babies and pubescents. Fans helping him can be explained by the social deprivation theory of crime - that crime is driven by grievances against society - which fits with Ian Watkins being Cambro-Norman and rock n' roll being about rebellion. The fans and him were Sadeans who wanted power over others in a intersectional society.
There’s a lot about this story that would make me wonder if it’s all made up, faked. The actor who played the performer, “Ian”, could be walking around the streets with no one the wiser.
That's the most ridiculous comment ever.
Yea … I would have said that myself a few years ago.
Why do you think Ian Watkins was an alias and his murder was just a cover to let him go free?